A lot of my problem with Tim Burton stems from my impression that artists who are really into Tim Burton tend to be fairly sadistic. Say what you will–Burton is, at this point, no different from that hipster couple that you hang out with getting stoned and making videos to put on YouTube, except he has a budget and international distribution–at his best, the man knew how to empathize with freaks. You know the exact type of person I mean when I talk about Burton fans though: I’ve been friends with many of them, and there’s a brokenness to them that is quite legitimately comforted by his films. Jack Skellington can be a horrible and alienating Santa…or he can be the best goddamn Hallowe’en King. Ed Wood makes horrible movies…but the companionship and sense of purpose it gives to these people outweigh everything. Edward Scissorhands cannot stay in the suburbs…but it’s taught him the values of beauty and love, and he’s changed Winona Ryder’s character forever.

But I find this follows into a sadism which bothers me. I’ve been in too many conversations where the phrase “the normals” is bandied about, and this is with people over the age of 25. It is a very odd defensive slur, especially considering it’s so ill-defined. It’s the kind of phrase you hear uttered by a young woman with a lot of piercings, wearing an inexpensive but not cheap dress, not quite kinderwhore but close enough, possibly bipolar and chainsmoking in a Jersey diner at 2 in the morning fresh from her shift at a theme restaurant off of Route 17, sitting across from her boyfriend, tall and big and bullish, buzzed hair, gauged ears and a nose ring, wearing a thrift store Army jacket, tattoos all over his arms, some cheap and some nicer, some done by friends, a cup of coffee in his hand–said to refer to, well, women who work in offices and wear mom jeans at 27 and drive minivans and aren’t quite ready for children but are finding themselves getting sloppy with the pill and debating every month whether to not even bother renewing the prescription this time, living in a house in Wayne a couple miles from their parents–they grew up on the same block, she’s two years older than he is, they always knew each other although their parents weren’t more than casual neighbors and they had no friends in common, only started hanging out about six or seven years ago when they found themselves to be regulars at this very diner, saying hello to each other as they walked past to join their own friends, once finding themselves at the giant booth when both of them were in diner groups that had a common member and decided to consolidate but on opposite sides of the table and unable to conveniently do more than vaguely check each other out, and finally one night, after her shift, stopping by and grabbing a table by herself because she didn’t see anyone she particularly felt like sitting with and enjoying the book she was reading, she saw him walk in and sit at the counter and decided she didn’t enjoy the book she was reading that much and asked him to join her and things pretty much progressed as you would expect and soon after they stopped going to the diner–he working somewhere in The City, driving a nice car, listening to Z100 and reading Dan Brown and no tattoos, no piercings, watching whatever movies came out that weekend no matter what, just being…well, normal. As they would never be.

Perhaps that’s what bothers me about Don Hertzfeldt, because, shit, his stuff is awesome, but he kind of hates his characters. They exist as little line drawings to torture. Invader Zim’s also bothered me for this reason–there’s little to love. It creates a cast of freaks–and then spends its time punishing them

I once went to a live interview that the local bookstore put on, John Waters had written a new book, Role Models, and the interviewer, I don’t remember who it was, asked how Waters felt about reality TV, given that its trashiness would seem right up Waters’s alley. Surprisingly, Waters said he found it horrible. He loves trashiness and he loves freaks, and the intent of his movies is to show you these people and make you laugh not to mock them, but because you find them so enjoyably themselves that it’s delightful. Reality TV intends you to laugh at the people–to feel a sense of schadenfreude. Pity, even. If there is one thing you can say about Waters’s movies, it’s that you can’t pity anyone in them, and so they oddly enough retain their dignity.

Little Inferno does the same trick that games like Cargo Commander do–it takes a genre, in this case sandbox simulation a la Doodle God. You’re given a fireplace and a catalog, and a little money, and you begin to order items to burn in your fireplace, with the standard progression where that unlocks more stuff to buy and more catalogs under different themes. And you get bonuses for burning combinations of items together–like, burning some popcorn and a television gives you a Movie Night combo. About half of the available combinations are required to beat the game, and you’re given a list with fairly broad hints from the start, with the added mercy that it highlights the particular combinations available to you at any moment.

There are plenty of games like that, and there’s enough of a quirkiness in just this to justify itself. The various objects you get to burn, their animations, the flavor text, it’s actually a kind of decent Satire of Consumerism, and as traditional of a theme as that is, there is a perverse pleasure in burning things, and everything is pretty funny–the sound design in particular is marvelous: You end up wanting to buy and burn items just because you want to hear the sounds they make.

Literally the very first item you can buy is a Little Inferno Collector Poster which reminds you that it “may lose value when burned”, and yet this is the opposite of the truth–burning an item releases a few more coins than it cost to make, and so it’s a very obvious example of capitalism feeding itself. An item is desired, it’s purchased, it’s used up, a more expensive item is desired and the cycle repeats until you buy the last item possible which is, quite literally, a miniature sun.

Okay, so that’s done, a $2.99 iPhone app that warns you against the evils of corporate greed, one which perhaps might have been more effective if it had contained particularly useless in app purchases but one lauds the developers for resisting. There is an extremely obvious place for them to have done so. When you order an item from the catalogue, it takes a fixed amount of time in order to arrive. You can collect stamps and spend them in order to skip the delivery time. It would have been extremely simple to sell packages of stamps. But that’s not the case, and in fact the game is extremely carefully balanced–the systems are designed to pace the player rather than to frustrate him. It’s generous with the stamps, for one–you get a few every time you find a combination, I believe whenever you burn a new item, hell, the game kind of just doles them out to you whenever the hell it feels like it. And the times aren’t severely long–towards the end of the game they average around two minutes, and that miniature sun takes six. After a little while, you pick up some tricks as far as staggering deliveries goes, and you usually have enough stamps to speed up nearly every delivery.

Once you pick up on that, I think you begin to get a sense that Little Inferno respects the player’s time–it’s not trying to trick me or anything. And that makes me a lot receptive to its message. The game exists for something more than to simply sell me something.

But for a while, what it appears to be isn’t that interesting, and it’s the reason I spent all that ink on Tim Burton earlier.  Most of the narrative is told through the form of letters you receive–some from the company, some weather reports, and some letters from a very disturbed girl who claims to be your neighbor. She is, disappointingly, your typical girl-with-a-knife cliche, and when the woman from the company sends you a video about the fireplace, and you note that the animation style is extremely Oyster Boy–well you can be forgiven for thinking this is going to be a cynical piece. You begin to learn why fireplaces are becoming the most popular toy, and the game begins to make it clear that, no, this isn’t a simple fireplace simulator. You’re controlling an avatar who is putting these things into the fireplace.

I’ve said that all games are about Nirvana; eventually Little Inferno ends not by punishing its freaks but by redeeming them. For its last few minutes it offers transcendence so complete that it changes genres entirely. What happens when you get everything you ever dreamed for, one character asks, and immediately answers the question: You dream bigger dreams. Are you worried it’s implying you need to consume more? Hardly. The entire end sequence is devoted towards characters suggesting that happiness is found not through products but by determining your own path.

A cliche theme, yes–but look at where Little Inferno looks like it’s headed. Your neighbor gets a little too interested in the fire and says she’s going to experiment with something–and suddenly everything shakes and rubble falls down your chimney and you find out from a letter that her house burned down and that she’s dead. Consumption, in this game, is a literal fire which can be beautiful, can be entertaining, can bring you profit, and most importantly can bring you warmth–but most horribly, can and probably will destroy you. The game could have ended there, and you know what, I’m shocked it didn’t because, I mean, how many other games end that way? Consumption is horrible–but it’s also unavoidable.

Why I love Little Inferno is that it suggests that solutions exist for transcending this cycle of desire and suffering. In no way are they easy and in no way is there a roadmap, but they are worth it. They are what makes life worth living. We find out that the neighbor is alive and well and on a beach and has begun to write in less troubling speech patterns. And you end up on a hot air balloon towards an uncertain future.

And so perhaps it is just as well that the game features no in-app purchases and is not endless. Throughout the game, characters harp on fire being fun to play with–but only in your Little Inferno fireplace. To play with fire anywhere else inside your home is to court disaster. Consumption, then, might not be horrible in and of itself–but it must be carefully kept within boundaries. You can enjoy a tree of items and dozens of combinations and all of that, but after a little while, you need to go and do something else.

Now turn off the computer and go to sleep.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s